W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > January 2003

RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)

From: Edwin Khodabakchian <edwink@collaxa.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:39:03 -0800
To: "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001401c2b5d4$6a59f610$690aa8c0@collaxa.net>

Agreed. The only reason I did not mention WSDL is that the Web Queue
resource does NOT expose customized methods or operations. - Edwin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:32 PM
> To: edwink@collaxa.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: A different binding example (was RE: Binding)
> 
> 
> 
> > When a developer issue a GET on
> > that resource, it returns the XML Schema of the expense report XML 
> > document that the queue accepts as input as well as meta 
> information:
> > - request needs to include a signature header element for 
> > authentication
> > - request needs a callback header element (containing a 
> callback URL).
> > - request needs a unique correlation set: rule on how the 
> unique key/message id
> >   can be computed using data element contained in the request.
> 
> It's probably faster to say that the GET returns the WSDL for 
> the service (assuming we'll soon have a standard way for 
> expressing SOAP Features in WSDL).
> 
> Ugo
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 6 January 2003 17:39:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:12 GMT