W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Transport-specific SOAP semantics - was Re: Visibility

From: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:59:17 -0500
To: "'www-ws-arch@w3.org '" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-id: <3E5CC835.4000404@Sun.COM>

+1. And we need to be consistent with this when [if] we decide to
define "synchronous" and "asynchronous".....

> I'd like to drain this trout pond.  I propose making sure that the glossary
> definition of "protocol independence" includes the concept that a Web
> service invocation has the same effect irrespective of the protocol or
> protocol-level features used to transmit it, and to action the editors to
> use Dave Orchard's  discussion of "visibility" in the document and glossary
> where appropriate.
> 
> That way we can move on, and Mark or whomever can raise a formal issue that
> we will record and address for consideration by others later in the W3C
> process.  Of course, if someone on the WG wants to discuss this further, we
> can do that.
> 
> I'm sure this will be seen as another sign of "the management" exerting
> schedule, but I think of it as just taking down the "Gone Fishin'" sign off
> the office  door. :-)
> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 09:05:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:15 GMT