W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Slightly updated diagram

From: Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston) <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:44:55 -0500
To: ext Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BA7BC1B7.35F4%michael.mahan@nokia.com>

I like both this diagram and Jean-Jacques' UML class diagram. There is a lot
in common and these should be consolidated. I believe an ERD is more
appropriate, so I would like to see some concepts in the class diagram
migrate to the ERD. Specifically the MEP entity and possibly the
Choreography entity.

To make the update ERD less busy I would recommend removing the 'has'
relationships between Service and the Interface and Semantics boxes. Those
relationships are redundant given that Interface and Semantics are referred
by the Description entity. I agree with the comment about Location and think
that it is on a peer level with Interface and Semantics.


On 2/20/03 6:23 PM, "ext Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com> wrote:

> Great diagram.
> Would it not be accurate to say that a service has an interface and a
> location, rather than an interface having a location? After all, you can have
> multiple services with the same interface at different locations.
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From:     www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]  On
>> Behalf Of Francis McCabe
>> Sent:    Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:59 PM
>> To:    www-ws-arch@w3.org
>> Subject:    Slightly updated diagram
>>  << File: pastedGraphic4.pdf >>
Received on Friday, 21 February 2003 11:44:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:03 UTC