On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > "intermediary" > ============== > Any reason not to refer to the SOAP definition? The glossary already defines "SOAP intermediary" separately, which is a good thing IMO, because a SOAP intermediary is less general than a vanilla intermediary. > "node" > ====== > Ibid. Ditto. 8-) My only original comment is on "system entity". There's an editorial comment asking about the relationship to a component. It appears to me as though a system entity *is* a component, so I'd suggest consolidating the two under "component". MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysisReceived on Friday, 14 February 2003 10:25:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:14 GMT