- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:26:36 -0500
- To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0100, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > "intermediary" > ============== > Any reason not to refer to the SOAP definition? The glossary already defines "SOAP intermediary" separately, which is a good thing IMO, because a SOAP intermediary is less general than a vanilla intermediary. > "node" > ====== > Ibid. Ditto. 8-) My only original comment is on "system entity". There's an editorial comment asking about the relationship to a component. It appears to me as though a system entity *is* a component, so I'd suggest consolidating the two under "component". MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 10:25:05 UTC