W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2003

RE: Definition for a Web Service

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:47:57 -0500
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E01817F42@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

I think that this happened because of all the confusion about URI's and
QNames.  As I understand it (and I am very willing to admit that I
understand this imperfectly), just about everyone concerned would be
VERY happy to say that Web services are identified by URI's -- except
that currently in WSDL they are identified by a Qname -- which is not
exactly a URI but can be mapped to a URI.  This, at the least, adds a
layer of confusion to any conversation on this subject.  I think that
the basic thinking was that the "Web-related standards" would lead one
sort of inevitably to URI's, and that the detailed issues could be dealt
with ... in the detailed sections, I guess.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:45 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Definition for a Web Service

Thanks for the new draft; obviously, this is the result of a lot of

Regarding the new definition for a Web Service: apart from being more 
specific (WSDL, SOAP, HTTP), which I like, the other major difference 
seems to be that a Web Service is no longer identified by a URI. Is this

intentional? Shouldn't this be added back?

A Web service is a software system identified by a URI [...].



Champion, Mike wrote:

> Update from the W3C publication team:
> New WD of "Web Services Architecture" Document is available at : 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-ws-arch-20030808/
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 10:48:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:08 UTC