W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o fWS A for the document

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:21:06 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E405774529@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
I'm torn between wanting the WSA to be consistent with the webarch, and
wanting the WSA constraints to be meaningful.  If anything with identity is
"on the web" that excludes essentially nothing (Dan Connolly's car is
supposedly "on the Web" because he has assigned it a URI in a domain he
controls). As several people noted on the telcon yesterday, an architecture
without constraints is not an architecture.
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: michael.mahan@nokia.com [mailto:michael.mahan@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 2:54 PM
To: martin.chapman@oracle.com; RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com;
www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Nailing down the definition of "Web services" and the scope o
fWS A for the document



An information object is 'on the web' if it has a URI. 
 
http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html
<http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html> 
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 15:21:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT