W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2003

RE: The stack diagram (was RE: Discussion topic for tomorrow's call

From: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:36:20 -0400
To: "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, "George Blanck" <gsblanck@nyc.rr.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ECEDLFLFGIEENIPIEJJPAECNDPAA.anne@manes.net>

+1 for George's new suggestion.

> <snip>

> I would start
> with four boxes and the two pillars very much like Hugo's diagram:
>
> Label for Box 1. "Processes" (rather than aggregation);  Content:
> "Examples: Discovery, Aggregation, Choreography..."
> Label for Box 2. "Services" (rather than description) Content:
> WSDL Service Descriptions
> Label for Box 3. "Messages"  include two boxes within Box 3a "SOAP
> Extensions" Box 3b: "SOAP"
> label for Box 4. "Transport" Content:  "HTTP, SMTP, JMS..."
> Pillar A: "Security"
> Pillar B: "Management"
>
> Base technology of 1-3 is XML shown either as a backplane or just included
> explicitly inside each box as "Base Technology: XML".  We do like to
> "factor" XML out separately but I don't think it would offend if it where
> just spelled out within each box but a back plane is more expressive.
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 11:35:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:17 GMT