W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"

From: <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:31:02 -0400
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296A0101CE16@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
To: <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Has 'Description Cache' been discarded yet? 

It is somewhat mechanism and role agnostic (more like a functional 
term using DaveO's original term criterias - as is 'registry'). It 
is a fairly abstract phrase, doesn't imply centralization (at least 
to me), is clear & simple, and cache is a well understood Internet 
term.  


Mike



>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org]
>Sent: September 30, 2002 12:22 PM
>To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
>
>
>
>* Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> [2002-09-27 16:27-0400]
>> I want to emphasize that Heather is talking about ROLES here, not
>> things, not mechanisms. A role is an abstraction as are the other
>> nodes (roles) in the triangle diagram.
>
>The problem with using a role with the top node is that, at least to
>me, it feels like this is a third entity different from the others,
>and registry has this feel of centralized thing. If we ended up
>settling for a role, I think that the following would need to be very
>clearly underlined:
>- the publication/discovery role is an abstract role which may be
>  fulfilled by the service provider itself.
>- there is no claim made as to how it is performed: it could be
>  achieved using any number of solutions, be it centralized or not.
>
>Ideally, the word used would carry all that, which IMO registry does
>not. Hence my preference is to use the description of an action:
>Publish/Discover, or Publication and Discovery Mechanisms, or
>Advertizing and Discovery Mechanisms to quote DaveH.
>
>Regards,
>
>Hugo
>
>-- 
>Hugo Haas - W3C
>mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 15:32:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:06 GMT