W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: XLink vs. HLink

From: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:55:08 -0400
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF48021423.6FAC509D-ON87256C41.004C5633@us.ibm.com>

Ah, I see that now. Read it too fast I think..

I retract the snide comments.

Heather Kreger
Web Services Lead Architect
STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

"Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>@w3.org on 09/27/2002
09:33:04 AM

Sent by:    www-ws-arch-request@w3.org

To:    www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject:    RE: XLink vs. HLink

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:00 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XLink vs. HLink
> Well,
> Once again, the press is able to predict our every move with great
> precision :-)
> Apparently we're supposed to be weighing in on XLink vs HLink.

Are you referring to "the W3C's Technical Architecture Group are weighing
into the debate"?  That's the TAG, not the WSA WG.  (David Orchard is in
both groups, so he's our eyes and ears there).   They have, ahem, weighed
in and set off a bit of a shouting match on the www-tag list.  I did
pontificate a little in that discussion yesterday, but made it clear that I
was speaking as a private citizen and not for the WSA WG.
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 09:55:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:59 UTC