- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:35:47 -0400
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Ugo, Maybe so, but it still suggests the three-party model; A wants to communicate with B, but is required to go to C in order to get the necessary information to do so. We know how to enable communication without a registry. It's not difficult. Let's promote that. Thanks. MB On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:57:42AM -0700, Ugo Corda wrote: > > >I think that UDDI hints at a central registry solution, and putting it > >in a sentence such as "the key to reaching this new horizon is a > >common program-to-program communication model" definitely pushes in > >this direction. > > Version 3 of UDDI has moved away from the concept of a central registry. > UDDI 3 supports multiregistry topologies (which is different than version > 2's multinode topologies based on node replication). For more details, see > UDDI 3 section 8, "Publishing Across Multiple Registries" [1]. > > Ugo > > [1] http://www.uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm#_Toc12653784 -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 12:35:31 UTC