W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

From: Sandeep Kumar <sandkuma@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:21:08 -0700
To: "Heather Kreger" <kreger@us.ibm.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>, <michael.mahan@nokia.com>

Hi All,
I have been thinking that the triangle approach really represents the
WS Programming/Interaction Paradigm.
Trying to define architecture stack around the paradigm picture is
a little counter-intuitive (on a second thought).

Can we define architecture stack for each side of the triangle/square
(as in Mike's proposal)? It gives us the freedom to simply be flexible and
use the
real-estate more freely.

Just a thought.

Sandeep Kumar

Cisco Systems

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Heather Kreger
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:37 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org; michael.mahan@nokia.com
Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

How about we do the simple triangle first that 'seems' client server.  I
have sent words for the triangle to chris the editor to render in
acceptable xml.

The only problem with the triange with the peer to peer is that it makes it
look like the pure requester is part of the scenario. I'd rather create a
new triangle that we present separately with appropriate words.

So, first simple 'requester/provider' triangle (btw, we didn't call them
client and server on purpose for exactly this reason)
Then we do a peer to peer
And then Rogers variation:
See attached:

(See attached file: triangle.variations.ppt)


Heather Kreger
Web Services Lead Architect
STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572

michael.mahan@nokia.com@w3.org on 09/23/2002 03:28:58 PM

Sent by:    www-ws-arch-request@w3.org

To:    <jones@research.att.com>, <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, Heather
cc:    <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Subject:    RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

Here is a diagram which better demonstrates p2p graphically.

BR, Mike

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext jones@research.att.com [mailto:jones@research.att.com]
>Sent: September 23, 2002 01:57 PM
>To: RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com; jones@research.att.com;
>Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
>I think the compromise would be to base most of the initial discussion
>around the simple, unadorned triangle, laying out the range of
>in the text.  The elaborated diagrams should either reflect a union of
>the abstractions and/or instantiations in the space or should reflect
>a particular architectural style.  I would be comfortable with
>the former
>if it doesn't make things too confusing, but would gladly accept the
>Mark A. Jones
>AT&T Labs
>Shannon Laboratory
>Room 2A-02
>180 Park Ave.
>Florham Park, NJ  07932-0971
>email: jones@research.att.com
>phone: (973) 360-8326
>  fax: (973) 236-6453
>     From RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com Mon Sep 23 13:45 EDT 2002
>     Delivered-To: jones@research.att.com
>     X-Authentication-Warning: mail-pink.research.att.com:
>postfixfilter set sender to RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com using -f
>     X-Server-Uuid: EE520CAE-7FCA-4D2A-A2DC-297BA4A725CC
>     From: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)"
>     To: "'Mark Jones'" <jones@research.att.com>,
>             "Heather Kreger" <kreger@us.ibm.com>
>     Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>     Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
>     Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:44:36 -0700
>     MIME-Version: 1.0
>     X-WSS-ID: 11918CF6275166-01-01
>     Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>     X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20
>     I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually
>to restrict web
>     services to one messaging pattern.  No matter what the
>words might say in
>     the text, I think that having pictures that leave this
>impression would not
>     be good.
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Mark Jones [mailto:jones@research.att.com]
>     Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:50 PM
>     To: Heather Kreger
>     Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>     Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f
>     Heather,
>     I  added 3 slides at the end of the set that you sent
>out.  I rearranged
>     and simplified the boxes and labels a bit.  I also
>began to append
>     concrete technology labels on some of the boxes.  (I
>just made a cursory
>     pass at this to see what it would look like.  Feel free
>to further flesh
>     it out.)  At least while we are deciding on the correct
>set of boxes and
>     labels, I think it helps to identify them.
>     Mark Jones
>     AT&T
>     Heather Kreger wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >Hi folks, Here are the architecture diagrams I drafted
>up during our
>     >meeting today. I have some words for some of this
>stuff that I will
>     >align and send to the group as soon as
>     >humanly possible.
>     >
>     >(See attached file: w3cStack.ppt)
>     >
>     >I have permission from IBM to submit both this stack
>and the origional
>     >triangle to the W3C for inclusion into the architecture and
>     >modification by the working group.
>     >
>     >Heather Kreger
>     >Web Services Lead Architect
>     >STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
>     >kreger@us.ibm.com
>     >919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
>     >
Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2002 13:25:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:59 UTC