W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:11:31 -0400
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Mark Jones <jones@research.att.com>
Cc: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <NFBBLCDGGLCHCHFEJFIGCEBFCIAA.katia@cs.cmu.edu>

Mark,
 "find" and such do not prescribe any particular technology, they just
indicate the functionality of the particular interaction.
 Cheers, Katia

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Mark Baker
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:26 PM
To: Mark Jones
Cc: Heather Kreger; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f



I wanted to say that the concern I raised about the triangle diagram -
that it's logical, but may be interpreted as suggesting the existence
of particular technologies - appears to be the case in Mark's slides
(though at the f2f we appeared to have started down this path).

I consider it a fundamental advance of the Web over previous distributed
systems, that "publish" and "find" are integrated into "interact", all
by virtue of the joined-at-the-hip relationship between a URI and the
HTTP GET method.

I suggest that we refrain from attempting to map specific technologies
to this diagram for this reason.  If we're going to do any mapping,
we should have a separate physical diagram with which to do that.

Thanks.

MB
--
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 10:13:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:05 GMT