W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

Re: remembering business data and taxonomy in description

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:55:50 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021015153425.02744ec8@localhost>
To: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

Heather,

What you have described is formally called an "ontology": 
http://www.w3.org/2002/Talks/0813-semweb-dbooth/slide37-0.html

Clearly, if we do define a WS ontology for this purpose, then either RDF or 
W3C's emerging Web Ontology Language (known as "OWL") should be used.  This 
will: (a) ensure maximum flexibility and re-use potential; and (b) ensure 
that the ontologies will always be cleanly extensible, without breaking 
existing software and without having to wait for a standards group to 
sanctify new "facts" or "rules" that people want to use.

At 07:07 PM 10/11/2002 -0400, Heather Kreger wrote:
>After the stack was accepted as a starting point at the face to face,
>someone brought up the need for business description and taxonomy to
>be described and associated with a service in a way that does not prescribe
>that UDDI be used.
>
>We had initially thought that this may mean a new description layer for the
>stack. But
>this didn't feel right.
>
>However, I  have talked with some others about this
>and would like to propose that this type of information is actually
>'information about the
>service'.  We had put other 'information about the service' in the policy
>layer and I would
>like to propose that this is where business and taxonomies should go as
>well.
>I believe that policies will contain 'facts' and 'rules'. Business data and
>taxonomies
>are facts.
>Once we have a policy language (ws-policy), there will need to be groups
>who define
>standards 'sets' of policies to standardize keywords and concepts for
>things like 'timeout', etc.
>I think that some group will need to define a standard owning business
>policy and
>taxonomy policy.   I think that the UDDIEntry defined by the UDDI
>specification
>  provides an excellent set of starter data for such a group.
>
>Opinions?



-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 15:54:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT