W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Spec draft

From: Newcomer, Eric <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:59:47 -0400
Message-ID: <DCF6EF589A22A14F93DFB949FD8C4AB2BA1208@amereast-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
By the way I want to be sure everyone recognizes Heather Kreger for her very significant contribution to the document, including the diagrams and a large part of the text.
 
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Newcomer, Eric; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Spec draft


Eric,
 
The document looks good to me so far. I have just a couple of comments.
 
- second block of text just below Figure 2, 
"The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure call (RPC) oriented interaction style"
 
It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document style instead of RPC.
 
- just before "Extended Web Services Architecture", 
"The interaction can be single message one way, broadcast from requester to many services, a multi message conversation, or a business process."
 
Is this an exhaustive list? Probably not. In that case it's better to rephrase it with something like "Examples of interactions are ...".
 
 
Ugo
 
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 14:00:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT