W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2002

RE: Web services and CORBA

From: Eric Newcomer <eric.newcomer@iona.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:33:11 -0400
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FFEDIILGIAFELAMIJNMNKEEODPAA.eric.newcomer@iona.com>

I'm still looking for the solution to my problem of a standard mapping onto
transaction-aware objects, programs, and databases ;-)


-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Mark Baker
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Eric Newcomer
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: Web services and CORBA

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:32:35PM -0400, Eric Newcomer wrote:
> If putting the method name in the message helps us achieve this sort of
> mapping, it's to the good, isn't it?

No, because it doesn't reflect how the Web currently works, either
in practice (for the vast majority of POST based forms), nor how it
was designed to be used.

>  And conversely, sticking to
> architectural purity that inhibits this type of mapping is to the bad,
> it?

I don't know what you mean by "purity".  I'm just trying to solve
business problems on the Web.

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 14:37:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:56 UTC