RE: D-AC001.1.1 discussion points

The statement IMO appears out-of-place to be structured under a
CSF which, as I understand it, is to encourage interoperability.
So I can appreciate ATT's view that D-AC001.1.1 is out of scope,
or at least out of the scope of interop.

If the spirit of the statement is to level the playing field
in the sense that being first-to-market and/or having a large
market share does not necessarily merit a product or an
idea's adoption for standards, then the wording can use
some revamping.  

"Do we really need this," Chris asked?
My take is: not really.
The boilerplate answer is of course: define "really." ;-)

Joe Hui
Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service
==========================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:48 AM
> To: wsawg public
> Subject: D-AC001.1.1 discussion points
> 
> 
> ATT: out of the scope
> 
> HP: How are we going to achieve this goal?
> 
> Comment from the Chair: this one is also close. It seems that
> in principle, this is a noble CSF, but it is difficult to
> measure and possibly impossible to achieve. Question:
> do we really need to say this?
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2002 17:10:25 UTC