W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2002

D-AC001.3.1 discussion points

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 09:35:13 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD92991.8030801@sun.com>
To: wsawg public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
ATT: out of scope

MITRE: Needs more discussion about "conformance", and caveat for "vendors" to include open source 

"Slack in the system" is another phrase that does not fit.

NOK: 'Clearly define specific factors that determine
conformance' seems to be covered by AC001.2.

'leaving sufficient slack in the system for
vendors to add value' seems like the extensibility

W3C: Having "[clear] specific factors that determine conformance" and
"slack" in the same sentence looks weird.

Isn't the second half of this CSF covered by the extensibility part of

Comment from the Chair:
	see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0147.html
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 09:37:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:56 UTC