W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > May 2002

RE: D-AR006.10 discussion points

From: Darran Rolls <Darran.Rolls@waveset.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:32:56 -0500
Message-ID: <6244FCD1F88EC14BACDD2A319FD33824278870@hawaii.waveset.com>
To: "wsawg public" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
On the assumption that "description" refers to WSDL, I'd like to re ask
the CMPQ question below?

--------------------------------------------------------
Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com 
(512) 657 8360                    
--------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com] 
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 8:59 AM
To: wsawg public
Subject: D-AR006.10 discussion points

WVST: This is very vague.  Security policy means a lot of different
things.  I apologize if I missed this one, but when we say "description"
what do we mean?

SYBS: To be discussed whether all Web Services need to have a
security policy

W3C: See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0013.html

ORCL: SHOULD->MUST, security is important enough that every WS must
have a security description, even if it is <no security>

CMPQ: Should the description of a Web Service be in the scope of WSDL WG
rather than WSA?
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:33:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:59 GMT