- From: Darran Rolls <Darran.Rolls@waveset.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:32:56 -0500
- To: "wsawg public" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
On the assumption that "description" refers to WSDL, I'd like to re ask the CMPQ question below? -------------------------------------------------------- Darran Rolls http://www.waveset.com Waveset Technologies Inc drolls@waveset.com (512) 657 8360 -------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com] Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 8:59 AM To: wsawg public Subject: D-AR006.10 discussion points WVST: This is very vague. Security policy means a lot of different things. I apologize if I missed this one, but when we say "description" what do we mean? SYBS: To be discussed whether all Web Services need to have a security policy W3C: See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0013.html ORCL: SHOULD->MUST, security is important enough that every WS must have a security description, even if it is <no security> CMPQ: Should the description of a Web Service be in the scope of WSDL WG rather than WSA?
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2002 00:33:27 UTC