> From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com] > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:20 AM > To: wsawg public > Subject: Re: D-AC006.2 discussion points > > > NOK: This is outside the scope of a group chartered to create > a reference > architecture and to create new WGs to fill protocol gaps. Huh? Security is still a group charter last I checked ;-) > Policies > are application level mechanisms - best left to be defined > bya Security WG or in the vendor solution space. Not really. Not even close. Policies were the horse as mechanisms were the cart. I.e. Policies are what drive mechanisms, not a part of them (mechanisms). In other words, mechanisms are for executing policies, speak wrt the established paradigm in network computing anyway. (Ref: routed, RIP, ...) Joe Hui Exodus, a Cable & Wireless serviceReceived on Tuesday, 7 May 2002 16:40:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:59 GMT