W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2002

RE: D-AG0008: "is coherent and consistent in its definition"

From: Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston) <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:50:10 -0500
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296A072C3B@bsebe001.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "ext Austin, Daniel" <Austin.D@ic.grainger.com>, "Timothy N. Jones" <tim@crossweave.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Austin, Daniel [mailto:Austin.D@ic.grainger.com]
> Sent: March 22, 2002 06:22 PM
> To: 'Timothy N. Jones'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: D-AG0008: "is coherent and consistent in its definition"
> 	One issue regarding this goal: this goal talks about 
> the definition
> of the architecture, i.e. the reference architecture that we 
> define. This
> reference architecture should be consistent and coherent. 
> This applies to
> both the reference architecture itself and the document that 
> contains its
> definition. 


This is the point I was attempting to make in the telecon and 
which I alluded to in [1]. 

"2. I think that this goal (11) is sufficiently exclusive relative 
to AG0008 ("is coherent and consistent in its definition"), 
at least the way I read AG0008. I believe (and can certainly 
be wrong here) that AG0008 talks to the way WS-A describes 
and models the reference architecture from a notation or 
syntactic perspective rather than whether the resultant 
definition is consistent with the existing web, which is the 
topic of this goal, AG0011. Please correct me if I am wrong, 
because then AG0008 and AG0011 should be combined, or one 
should be killed off or redefined."

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Mar/0181.html
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 10:50:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:55 UTC