RE: Missing in Goals?

Anne,

Thanks for the clarification. That was pretty much I had in mind.

Hao

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:anne@manes.net]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:47 AM
To: Munter, Joel D; Www-Ws-Arch@W3. Org
Subject: RE: Missing in Goals?


I think Hao He is talking about defining a standard convention to instrument
a web service and make the collected instrumentation data available to a
management framework.

Anne

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Munter, Joel D
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing in Goals?
>
>
>
> I believe that your items cited as 1. and 2. below are being discussing in
> separate threads.  Please define what you mean by the expression
> "should the
> web services be managed in a standard way".
> Thanks, Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hao He [mailto:Hao.He@thomson.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:39 PM
> To: 'Damodaran, Suresh'; 'Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)';
> www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing in Goals?
>
>
> How about:
>
> 1. Supporting transaction?
> 2. Providing service matrics, ie. quality of service, realibility of
> service, availability of service etc.
> 3. Managing services.  Should a web service be managed in a standard way?
>
> Hao He
>