W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Missing in Goals?

From: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:46:57 -0500
To: "Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>, "Www-Ws-Arch@W3. Org" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CJEIKEMEBAONGDDNLEKFMEGPDOAA.anne@manes.net>
I think Hao He is talking about defining a standard convention to instrument
a web service and make the collected instrumentation data available to a
management framework.

Anne

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Munter, Joel D
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing in Goals?
>
>
>
> I believe that your items cited as 1. and 2. below are being discussing in
> separate threads.  Please define what you mean by the expression
> "should the
> web services be managed in a standard way".
> Thanks, Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hao He [mailto:Hao.He@thomson.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:39 PM
> To: 'Damodaran, Suresh'; 'Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)';
> www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Missing in Goals?
>
>
> How about:
>
> 1. Supporting transaction?
> 2. Providing service matrics, ie. quality of service, realibility of
> service, availability of service etc.
> 3. Managing services.  Should a web service be managed in a standard way?
>
> Hao He
>
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 12:47:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:56 GMT