W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2002

RE: D-AG0016 - Technology Gaps

From: Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:07:41 +1000
Message-ID: <E74B412A1B5FD211AD6C0000F87C38ADE6676F@ozyexc1.itg.qvar.cpqcorp.net>
To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>, Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
This is a good point.  In fact, the charter says
"The Working Group should also identify what existing W3C technologies
already address functions required by the architecture identified."
I wanted to avoid a discussion over *whose* existing standards and
technologies at this point of high-level requirements
identification.  Therefore I took the path that in order to identify gaps,
existing technologies would be flushed out during the process.
 

Regards, 
Yin Leng 

  
  

-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com] 
Sent: Friday, 8 March 2002 11:33 AM
To: Yin Leng Husband
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: D-AG0016 - Technology Gaps


This is good point. However I think we should recommend existing standards
wherever available to avoid re-inventing. How about something on the lines: 

"Identify architectural and technology gaps that prevent interoperability to
formulate standards-based remedies;  recommending existing standards and
technologies where available and formation of new working groups where none
available." 


Regards, Prasad 


-------- Original Message -------- 

Subject: 	 D-AG0016 - Technology Gaps	
Resent-Date: 	 Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:14:38 -0500 (EST)	
Resent-From: 	 www-ws-arch@w3.org	
Date: 	 Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:22:11 +1000	
From: 	 Yin Leng Husband <Yin-Leng.Husband@compaq.com>	
To: 	 www-ws-arch@w3.org	

 I've taken an action item to drive DAG0016- Technology Gaps requirement
discussion. 
  The current proposed wording is 
 "DAG0016 
 [The Working Group will also act to] identify current gaps in architectural
interoperability and recommend standards-based remedies". 


  As this architecture group is clearly chartered not to design the gap
technologies itself, I would like to suggest changing to"identify
architectural and technology gaps that prevent interoperability; and
recommend formation of new working groups to formulate standards-based
remedies". 


   <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office
<urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office> " /> 
  

Yin Leng

  
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 20:59:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:56 GMT