W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."]

From: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:20:32 -0700
To: "Joseph Hui" <jhui@digisle.net>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB2D862FB.EBE249A5-ON88256B6F.00640177@boulder.ibm.com>
I've just been monitoring this conversation as much as possible, but I'd 
like to just throw this comment out there.

A Web Service must be defined as having the properties that it can be 
decribed and discovered.  Both the Web service and it's description must 
be discoverable.

Here we have two requirements and part of a definition.

Requirement 1 ==> A Web service must be describable and discoverable
Requirement 2 ==> A Web service description must be discoverable
Definition ==> A Web service can be described and discovered.

- James M Snell/Fresno/IBM
    Web services architecture and strategy
    Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM
    544.9035 TIE line
    559.587.1233 Office
    919.486.0077 Voice Mail
    jasnell@us.ibm.com
 Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN 
0596000952 

==
Have I not commanded you?  Be strong and courageous.  Do not be terrified, 

do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you 
go.  
- Joshua 1:9

Sent by:        www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
To:     <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
cc: 
Subject:        RE: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."]



By now IMHO we the WG have made the progress that D&D ought to be
in the def.  (Have we not?  I don't want to be presumptuous here.)
So the issue to be settled is whether D&D is already accounted for
in URI.

In my view URI is for addressability.  A globally unique ID offers
no intrinsic value to a resource's discovery.  E.g. there's no way
johny, seeking to buy books, can discover a book seller by
inferring from a URI like http://www.amazon.com.
Mark's made some good points; yet I find the "D&D-accounted-for-in-URI"
argument too tenuous.  Withi the web context, D&D is an integral
(as Sandeep put it) part of WS.  It's not a property that can be
assumed by default, thus calling it out is warranted.

Cheers,

Joe Hui
Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service
=========================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 6:53 AM
> To: Sandeep Kumar
> Cc: Vinoski Stephen; Joseph Hui; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."]
>
>
> Sandeep,
>
> > If D&D are not an integral part of a Web Service defintion,
>
> I was claiming that discoverability *is* an integral part of the
> definition.  It's just already accounted for by defining that a Web
> service be URI identifiable.
>
> I know this is a bit different than some Web service work people have
> already done, but this is (IMO) one of those times where our
> mandate to
> be integrated with Web architecture effects our work.
>
> > pl help me define
> > how would you define a Web (or a Network) of Web Services,
> the participants.
> >
> > At a high-level, they must at least have the same
> characteristics. If not,
> > it would be much harder to reason about them semantically, deal with
> > managing & monitoring them.
>
> Sorry, I'm unclear what you're asking.
>
> MB
> --
> Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
> Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
> http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
>
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 13:21:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:55 GMT