W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2002

RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenar i o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen arios document)

From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:03:17 -0500
Message-ID: <40AC2C8FB855D411AE0200D0B7458B2B07C59779@scidalmsg01.csg.stercomm.com>
To: "'Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)'" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, "'bytecode@Phreaker.net'" <bytecode@Phreaker.net>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

Thanks, Roger. I was not aware of this update.
-Suresh
Sterling Commerce   



-----Original Message-----
From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Damodaran, Suresh; 'bytecode@Phreaker.net'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage
Scenari o s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture
Usag e S cen arios document)



Uh, what about the WS Usage Scenarios URL Hugo posted?

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/ws-arch-scenarios-20020619.html

I believe that this is more current.

-----Original Message-----
From: Damodaran, Suresh [mailto:Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:14 AM
To: 'bytecode@Phreaker.net'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o
s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usag e S cen
arios document)




Sam,

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/wd-wsawg-scenarios-05012002.html
has the WS usage Scenarios. If are enquiring on any other doc. please
clarify.

Cheers,

-Suresh
Sterling Commerce   



-----Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:bytecode@Phreaker.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:13 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: S600: Comments on the Web Services Architecture Usage Scenari o
s document (was Re: New draft of the Web Services Architecture Usage S cen
arios document)



Whats the URL to the latest copy of this doc ?

Thanks
/s




Mark Baker wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:06:40PM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote:
> > Yes, I agree. This truly is the middle ground:-)
> > The key is separating the semantics from the protocol.
> > Lets hope we do it right.
> 
> I'd say that the key is defining *both* the semantics and the 
> protocol. Some Internet-scale systems separate the two, such as NFS 
> and DNS (both are built on an RPC layer).  But most don't; they are 
> built with a single specification, an application protocol.
> 
> MB
> --
> Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
> Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
> http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 14:04:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:01 GMT