W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2002

[USTF] notes 2002-06-20 telecon

From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 17:49:18 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020620170521.04db2478@mailsrv1.mitre.org>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org

Agenda:
1.  Other sources for usage scenarios
2.  Process to add scenarios

Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) use cases

Dave Orchard
Martin Chapman, Zulah working use cases at WS-I
eg, 2 use cases now

Need a champion per group

W3C as integration point for other groups

use case numbers?

go to wsawg list, identify groups, ask for volunteers

rules, regulations

Martin and Zulah volunteer for OMA and WS-I

P2P folks?

DO example
foo.org has 67 use cases.

if foo.org active and serious about use case, and w3c/wsawg member, then 
bring their use cases into wsawg

Exclude foo.com use cases if not wsawg member

OMA UC's need close scrub, different format than W3C

how to partition ownership?

Denning: keep traceability if UCs get combined

Use Cases, not usage scenarios

Now have 2 use cases (travel agent, EDI)

use case - detail like devices, etc.

DaveO and Martin have different idea of what constitutes as use case.

ACTION: Zulah, write task list, send to list

2.

Editors meeting at f2f

F2F break-out groups for confidentiality, authentication, integrity aspects 
of travel service use case
Need group leaders (or someone) to write up what the group reported at the F2F

use Thing document has usages scenarios and use case

authentication: (Martin) write up what was presented to the group

integrity (?)

Format of use cases and usage scenarios?

DO prefers looser rather than many mandatory fields to fill in

Can WS-I document be released to W3C
Monday WS-I review of use cases.  Martin will begin discussion in WS-I of 
releasability.

Latest doc at
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/ws-arch-scenarios-20020619.html
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 17:49:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:00 GMT