At our first F2F in San Jose we had a preliminary discussion on how the architecture would be represented (or what the metamodel would be). I believe the 4+1 View Model was suggested as one possibility. The metamodel for the current document is unclear and I'm wondering if we should return to the metamodel discussion before continuing with (or commenting on) the existing document? Zulah [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/06/wd-wsa-arch-20020605.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 19:37:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:00 GMT