W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Suggestion for AC009

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 23:06:45 -0400
To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Cc: wsawg public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20020602230645.D1706@www.markbaker.ca>

All,

On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:30:24AM -0400, Christopher Ferris wrote:
>    	D-AR009.1 It should be possible to characterize the semantics of a web
>   		service using technologies adopted as part of the semantic web.

"characterize the semantics" is a good and useful thing to do, but it's
just one of the many things that Semantic Web technologies can be used
for.  The original D-AR009.1 better reflected this, IMO.

> 
>   	D-AR009.2 Web services should be representable as Concepts in W3C OWL

Is "Concept" capitalized for any particular reason?  I couldn't find a
reference to the word as a proper noun in any of the work produced so
far by WebOnt.

Also, does OWL need to be singled out?  I think if we went with a
D-AR009.1 that was more inclusive, like the existing version, then we
wouldn't need to mention any specific technology.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2002 22:58:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:00 GMT