- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 23:06:45 -0400
- To: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Cc: wsawg public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
All, On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:30:24AM -0400, Christopher Ferris wrote: > D-AR009.1 It should be possible to characterize the semantics of a web > service using technologies adopted as part of the semantic web. "characterize the semantics" is a good and useful thing to do, but it's just one of the many things that Semantic Web technologies can be used for. The original D-AR009.1 better reflected this, IMO. > > D-AR009.2 Web services should be representable as Concepts in W3C OWL Is "Concept" capitalized for any particular reason? I couldn't find a reference to the word as a proper noun in any of the work produced so far by WebOnt. Also, does OWL need to be singled out? I think if we went with a D-AR009.1 that was more inclusive, like the existing version, then we wouldn't need to mention any specific technology. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Sunday, 2 June 2002 22:58:27 UTC