W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: [hst] ebXML

From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:34:02 -0500
Message-ID: <40AC2C8FB855D411AE0200D0B7458B2B07C598E4@scidalmsg01.csg.stercomm.com>
To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org

Hi Mark, I don't know how to respond.
To be honest, I did have the impression, and now I know I was wrong.
No offence intended. I look forward to your comments.
Sterling Commerce   

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Damodaran, Suresh
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: [hst] ebXML

Sorry Suresh, but I don't understand this response.  I was just
providing some comments on your harvesting.  I wasn't trying to suggest
that ebXML be ignored by WSA, or that it isn't useful.  I honestly don't
know where you got that impression, but if it was from something that I
may have inadvertently said, then I apologize.


On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 09:26:01AM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote:
> Mark,
> For me much of ebXML is not a theoretical discussion - having actually
> implemented many of its elements, and found it a very rich and useful
> framework 
> from B2B point of view. Feel free to augment my report on ebXML with
> comments such as below - I welcome it, though I am at the moment hard
> pressed
> for time to explore your comments further. I consider the purpose of the
> ebXML report
> served if it stimulates harvesting thoughts within HST. I am not expecting
> to duplicate the enormous effort spent by domain experts in creating
> I do think, however, enabling ebXML or similar frameworks should be within
> the scope of WS.

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2002 11:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:57 UTC