- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:40:00 -0600
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:21 PM > To: Champion, Mike > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: D-AR003.1; wording re transport/transfer > > > > That's true, it's the architecture document that I'm most concerned > about. If it's what we're going to be asking reviewers (read; the > TAG 8-) to focus on, then I'd be ok with that. But if we're going to > ask the TAG to review the requirements document, then I'd request this > clarification be made. My understanding of the W3C process (Hugo or someone correct me ...) is that Requirements documents don't really have any formal status other than as statements of intent ... until last call, at which time reviewers are to evaluate how the actual spec stacks up against the requirements. I don't think asking the TAG for guidance would be productive at this time; let's study what they said about the SOAP GET/HTTP issue and make sure that the WSA doc reflects that.
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 12:40:58 UTC