David Orchard wrote: > > Paul, > > Rest (:-) assured, I haven't forgotten to respond to your note. In what > little time I've had available since thursday morning, I worked on the > ws-arch document. That is a higher priority for the working group at this > time. I understand! No problem. > I have a rather detailed rebuttal that I've only made some progress on - > it's basically that the conversation ID isn't *really* an ID, it's actually > a data structure used by dispatchers to keep the dispatcher stateless. Okay, you'll still have to convince me that that's an argument against making it a resource...but maybe you will. > I'm also strongly against using GET to retrieve a WSDL file for a web > service. If only the spec that specifies that was done within the W3C, I > would bring it up to the TAG. Perhaps someone should publish an alternative mechanism as a NOTE. For instance if there were a standard SOAP header then the GET on an endpoint could return anything relevant but it would have a header to the WSDL. -- Come discuss XML and REST web services at: Open Source Conference: July 22-26, 2002, conferences.oreillynet.com Extreme Markup: Aug 4-9, 2002, www.extrememarkup.com/extreme/Received on Monday, 22 July 2002 12:42:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:02 GMT