- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:22:28 +0200
- To: Anne Thomas Manes <atm@systinet.com>
- CC: "Www-Ws-Arch@W3. Org" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Anne, Just a clarification on one of your points. I agree with the others. Jean-Jacques. Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > 2.4 Understanding SOAP Headers. Question. > Is it true that if a "mustUnderstand" header is targeted at a specific role, > but the message is never routed through a node that assumes that role, then > the header is never processed, and the Ultimate Receiver can simply ignore > it? Yes. (But this was discussed at length.) > Is there a way to specify that a message must not be processed if > certain headers have not been processed (i.e., a true "mandatory" header)? No, there is no such mechanism currently. > Or is this left as an undefined extension feature or a proprietary SOAP > server feature? This feature is indeed left to a possible future extension.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2002 09:25:18 UTC