W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Comments on SOAP 1.2 Part 1

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:22:28 +0200
Message-ID: <3D381294.631FC0CD@crf.canon.fr>
To: Anne Thomas Manes <atm@systinet.com>
CC: "Www-Ws-Arch@W3. Org" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>


Just a clarification on one of your points. I agree with the others.


Anne Thomas Manes wrote:

> 2.4 Understanding SOAP Headers. Question.
> Is it true that if a "mustUnderstand" header is targeted at a specific role,
> but the message is never routed through a node that assumes that role, then
> the header is never processed, and the Ultimate Receiver can simply ignore
> it?

Yes. (But this was discussed at length.)

> Is there a way to specify that a message must not be processed if
> certain headers have not been processed (i.e., a true "mandatory" header)?

No, there is no such mechanism currently.

> Or is this left as an undefined extension feature or a proprietary SOAP
> server feature?

This feature is indeed left to a possible future extension.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2002 09:25:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:57 UTC