RE: Closing AG005 issues - AC003 CSFs

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:33 AM
> To: Champion, Mike
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Closing AG005 issues - AC003 CSFs
> 
 
 
> How about a suggested replacement then;
> 
> D-AR003.1 supports multiple transport and application protocols.

> that we support lots of  protocols, but we
> don't *require* that application protocols be tunnelled over 
> (though we don't preclude it either).

That sounds like a very constructive suggestion. I can live with it and
recommend (wearing my "champion of getting this issue closed" hat) that we
adopt it and move forward.


> Oops.  There's a namespace maintenance problem here.  The D-AR003.6
> you're referring to was never balloted, because it was proposed after
> balloting had occured.  The old 3.6 has been dropped.  

Sorry, and thanks for catching this!  


> In fact, we decided on the last conference call to drop the 
> draft status
> from this requirement, after deciding to move it under MikeM's new
> "supports early and late binding" requirement;
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0238.html

Good, that's exactly where it belongs.

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 09:33:01 UTC