W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: [RTF] AR007.1.2 proposal to WSA WG

From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:13:04 -0500
Message-ID: <40AC2C8FB855D411AE0200D0B7458B2B07C59840@scidalmsg01.csg.stercomm.com>
To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Wsa-public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Since those items "referred to" are essential (and are not just "commentary"
items)
for reliability of WSA, I would prefer keeping it the way it has been
proposed.
It is a requirement, as currently written, as you can also see.

Cheers,

-Suresh
Sterling Commerce



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:20 PM
To: Damodaran, Suresh
Cc: Wsa-public (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [RTF] AR007.1.2 proposal to WSA WG


On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 09:59:02PM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote:
> This proposal is to resolve the concerns as discussed in [1].
> Instead of explicitly stating the said items, RTF chose to refer to them.

Yes, I understand, I read the emails.

I think the idea of bundling them together for easy easy access is a
fine one.  But IMO, it doesn't need to be a requirement, CSF, or goal
(and isn't, as written).  So let's just put that text in a grey box, and
fit it somewhere in AC007 or AG002, without any req/csf/goal label.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 23:13:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:01 GMT