W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: D-AC004 Status

From: <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:39:27 -0400
Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296A072D06@bsebe001.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Hugo, Sorry for the tardy response.

>> AR00X.4: (this still needs work)
>> component relationships are described in terms of messages 
>and message 
>> transmission protocols. (original)
>> OR
>> relationships between components must be well described
>> (suggested, I feel this is not enough)
>I think that there is a terminology problem here.
>The first proposal suggests that "components" means Web services. I
>understand the second one as referring to components of the
>architecture, such as choreography, security.
>I am happy with the first one, but I think that "components" is a
>confusing word to use here.

I have been leaning towards the first first too. The intent is to define
what really is a relationship/connector in the WS architecture. However
there has been some pushback on the first and the second does not address 
the intent of the requirement. 

I believe the group, with maybe the harvesting TF taking the lead, needs
to get some concensus on the terms, notation, and method to model the 

Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 16:40:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:57 UTC