hi, The RTF wants people's view on the following issue: Do we need a Conceptual Management Model in the requirement document? I proposed the following two items[1] to be added to D-AC18 [2] proposed by Zula and Heather. AR018.1.5 Define a standard (conceptual) management model for architectural components, their dependencies and their lifecycles. AR018.1.5 Define a standard (conceptual) management model for Web Services instances, their dependencies and their lifecycles. My motivation for suggesting them is that a high-level conceptual management model can 1) help ensure a WS architecture and service manageable; 2) be a standard starting point for future work on WS management; 3) unify metrics, management operations, and events as outlined in AR018.1 and AR018.2[2]; 4) help the deployment of a WS. Any thoughts and comments on this issue would be appreciated. Hao [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0138.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jun/0116.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:01 GMT