What is it exactly that we have included so far is part of architecture and not part of a description? We should certainly be concerned with description of anything needed in a WS *technical* contract. We may postpone certain elements until clarified by the Architecture WG. -- Igor Sedukhin .. (Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com) -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788 -----Original Message----- From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@zolera.com] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:01 PM To: Sadiq, Waqar Cc: Jacek Kopecky; Paul Prescod; www-ws-desc@w3.org; 'www-ws-arch@w3.org' Subject: Re: Reference requirements +1!! > I am very concerned that we seem to be looking for a solution to a > problem that is fundamentally an architecture problem and not a > description problem. -- Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption) http://www.zolera.comReceived on Thursday, 21 February 2002 14:24:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:54 GMT