W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > December 2002

Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:12:25 -0500
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD8BA2DE2.DA8031D8-ON85256C95.004DB76F-85256C95.004DE3CC@rchland.ibm.com>
Jean-Jacques,

It isn't clear to me that we would want to have more than the framework 
itself
in the arch doc as the WSAWG isn't supposed to be getting to tat level of
detail. However, it might be possible to characterize it as an example 
that
*could* be used...

What do others think?

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624



"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> 
Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
12/19/2002 11:45 AM

To
www-ws-arch@w3.org
cc

Subject
Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc







Chris,

Just looking again at your first draft. What about adding an 
abstract MEPs, namely request-response, described from the SOAP 
request-response MEP?

Jean-Jacques.
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 10:03:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:11 GMT