W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > December 2002

RE: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration

From: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:04:59 -0800
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021219125306.01b5a8b0@franklin.cisco.com>
To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, "Pae Choi" <paechoi@earthlink.net>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

I think whether one side needs to implement a "listener" depends on whether 
it is implementing a "push-based" or "pull-based" interaction style.  Both 
styles can be used to implement the same conversational semantics.

In a "push" style, so somebody will call you later, therefore you have to 
provide a listener that they can call.

But you don't need listener in "pull" style, I can think of at least 2 
cases ...

1) Client send a request and then "synchronously" wait for the response 
after the processing is done.
2) Client send a request and immediately get back a receipt which contains 
a tracking number.  Then after a reasonable among of time, the client send 
polling message (along with the tracking number) and get back the response 
when the processing is done.

Rgds, Ricky

At 02:31 PM 12/19/2002 -0600, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote:

>I think that the purchasing operation is more an interaction between
>peers than it is a client-server-like operation.  That is, the buyer may
>send the initial request for information, but then the seller sends in
>turn sends various responses and requests for information.  It is a
>conversation.
>
>This, of course, is a view based on the scenario of businesses
>interacting with each other, which is what the purchasing use case is
>pretty much about.  We are NOT really thinking in terms of an individual
>purchasing things, in which case it would be much less an interaction
>between peers.
>
>I don't think tha B2B purchasing operations taking place through web
>services make much sense unless both sides of the interaction are web
>services enabled.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pae Choi [mailto:paechoi@earthlink.net]
>Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:18 PM
>To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Subject: Web services Requirement at the client side in Orchestration
>
>
>
>One quick question in [1]the Web Services Architecture as stated under
>the section, "3.3.3.2.2 Orchestration", as follows:
>
>
>3.3.3.2.2 Orchestration
>
><snip>
>"For example, the seller must have web services that receive request for
>quote (RFQ) messages, purchase order (PO) messages and payment messages.
>The buyer role must have Web services that receive quotes (RFQ response
>messages), invoice messages and account summary messages." </snip>
>
>
>How come the buyer(i.e., client) MUST have "Web services." The client
>should be able to acess and interact with Web sevices provided by the
>seller, i.e., the Web services provider, without having Web services at
>the client side. I cann't think of any scenario that the client, i.e.,
>excluding the intermediary, need to have Web services. Any comments?
>
>Regards,
>
>
>Pae
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-arch-20021114/#id2616565
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 16:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:11 GMT