- From: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:49:32 -0500
- To: "'Duane Nickull'" <duane@xmlglobal.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Duane: Thanks for the pointer this is a great presentation. However, I would argue that there is a fundamental difference in the way ebXML and the Web Service Architecture represents the world. The WSA views the world as a series of single-sided APIs that collaborate, while ebXML looks at the arbitrary exchanges of message between two parties (without taking the point of view of any party). This separation between the collaboration view (BPSS) and the business agreements (CPA) on one hand as well as the technical binding (CPP) on the other hand is very healthy in B2B scenarios. Is there any progress made in bringing these two approaches together? Jean-Jacques Dubray____________________ Chief Architect Eigner Precision Lifecycle Management 200 Fifth Avenue Waltham, MA 02451 781-472-6317 jjd@eigner.com www.eigner.com >>-----Original Message----- >>From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org] On >>Behalf Of Duane Nickull >>Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:28 PM >>To: www-ws-arch@w3.org >>Subject: eBusiness Web Services (ebXML) >> >> >>FYI >> >>This is an interesting presentation prepared by Matt MacKenize. It >>touches on a few topics of reliable messaging for web services etc. >> >>http://www.sigmalogica.com/presentations/ebxml_web_services.ppt >> >>Web services are becoming an integral part of what ebXML is evolving >>into. The latest Registry has a newly designed (in progress) WSDL >>binding. >> >>Duane Nickull
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 14:49:02 UTC