W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > December 2002

RE: WSA constraints

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:23:03 -0700
Message-ID: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E4049BCFDE@usmsg03.sagus.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: Champion, Mike
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: WSA constraints
> 
> 
> For example, there's an implicit requirement that Web 
> services will work
> between companies, which requires the property of "visibility" (unlike
> working within companies, which doesn't).  We need to identify which
> constraints of the WSA induce this property.
> 

I think this is reasonable, but don't follow completely.  The way I envision
it, the REST constraints might identify a "bootstrappable" (maybe what you
mean by "visible") way for Web service providers and consumers to do
business in a very loosely coupled way.  Of course, that meets some of our
requirements, but doesn't describe the most typical scenarios in which Web
services are actually used today.  Thus, we could/should document the REST
constraints as one aspect of the WSA, with appropriate language about it MAY
be the optimal approach when its assumptions are met.  

> Examples would be the easiest and least controversial way to do this.
> But I'd like to defer this until we've documented some constraints.

Perhaps, but induction of what you're proposing from examples would help
too.
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 10:23:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:11 GMT