W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > December 2002

RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels of Rel iable Messaging)

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:42:33 -0600
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E01624867@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, "Assaf Arkin" <arkin@intalio.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
I believe that this is
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Dec/0083.html, as
referenced in my summary.
 
Although I am obviously far less expert than the people having this
technical discussion, perhaps I could comment that it worries me that
they, or someone, is talking about sending level 0 of this stack to XMLP
and defering the higher levels.  This does not seem right to me because
level zero does not seem to include the basics contained in the ebXML RM
spec -- which I consider to be somewhat minimal.  Aspects that do not
seem to be contained are repeated tries at delivery by the sender and
handling by the receiver of repeated receptions of the same message.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com] 
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:18 PM
To: Assaf Arkin; Champion, Mike; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different Levels
of Rel iable Messaging)


 

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com]
	Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:39 PM
	To: Champion, Mike; www-ws-arch@w3.org
	Subject: RE: Next Steps in Reliable Messaging (was RE: Different
Levels of Rel iable Messaging)
	
	
	I apologize for any lengthy discussion on my part. 
	 

Not at all!  I'm not trying to stifle the discussion, just make sure
that we touch on the topics that the working group will ultimately have
to deal with to push the idea forward. 
 
Can someone point us to David's "6 levels" ... recall that not all of us
have read the whole thread.
 
Thanks again!
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 00:42:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:11 GMT