W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > December 2002

Re: "Reliable" web services for Next Big Thing? (was RE: Agenda for 5 December WSA telcon)

From: Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston) <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:29:07 -0500
To: "ext Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, "Baker, Mark" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BA1B9CA3.2289%michael.mahan@nokia.com>

Hi Eric,

On 12/9/02 12:36 AM, "ext Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com> wrote:

> <mark:messageid>http://foofoo.org/mid/232394820480234</mark:messageid>
> <mark:qos>http://ackack.org/qos/ack</mark:qos>
> But I'd simplify it further to just send a plain "ack" for a message with a
> given unique ID. In that context the rest of the "qos" namespace URI would not
> really be needed but I agree with your idea or assumption that whatever we do
> should be extensible and flexible.  But actually a simple ack is what I'd like
> us to focus on for the initial proposal, so perhaps an even simpler example
> would be better:
> <mark:ack>http://ackack.org/ack</mark:ack>

While agreeing that this is simplier, isn't reliability a qos feature and
should/could be grounded or encapsulated as such?

Mike Mahan, Nokia
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 13:39:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:01 UTC