W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2002

RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements?

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:13:10 -0700
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E2EAEBC@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

I would not have thought so, personally -- but perhaps it might.  There is a
phrase about "service level agreements", and I guess this sounds like it is
somewhere in the same ballpark ... But to me "reliable messaging" has
something to do with a messaging protocol more than an agreement or
"managing" web services.  I did try to define "reliable messaging" in an
earlier posting
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Aug/0218.html), since
nobody else was responding to the invitation to do so.  

One thing I am sure of, however, is that the phrase "reliable messaging"
does not appear anywhere in the requirements doc other than D-AC017.  If you
look at the early-draft architecture doc you will see that there is all
sorts of stuff popping up about this, and lots of people have expressed
concern about the subject -- so it wouldn't seem to me that having something
in the requirements about it would be very hard to follow through on.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 3:47 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements?


* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com> [2002-08-22
12:40-0700]
> Basically I'm willing to let it go and it seems to me that the sense 
> of the group is moving this way, with the exception that I am REALLY 
> opposed to letting go completely the subject of reliable messaging.  
> If D-AC017 went away there would be no mention of reliable messaging 
> whatever in the requirements, and I think that this would be very 
> inappropriate given the level of interest and priority that is widely 
> put on this subject.  So I am basically proposing getting rid of 
> D-AC017 but adding something specifically about reliable messaging.

Doesn't AC018, with its fairly large umbrella, cover reliable messaging?

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 15:13:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:04 GMT