W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:48:11 -0400
To: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020820144811.G25814@www.markbaker.ca>

That's ok too, but it doesn't achieve what I want to achieve;
documenting the *differences*.

Is that so controversial?

We could even call it "Integrating WSA with Web Architecture", just to
make reference to our charter.


On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Francis McCabe wrote:
> Rather than a section on standard orthodoxies and heresies, it may be 
> better to have a section that highlights the `input base' ideas that the 
> WSA draws from. That way, you can point out the inheritances from REST, 
> OMA etc. in a way that isn't threatening.

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:49:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:58 UTC