That's ok too, but it doesn't achieve what I want to achieve; documenting the *differences*. Is that so controversial? We could even call it "Integrating WSA with Web Architecture", just to make reference to our charter. MB On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Francis McCabe wrote: > Rather than a section on standard orthodoxies and heresies, it may be > better to have a section that highlights the `input base' ideas that the > WSA draws from. That way, you can point out the inheritances from REST, > OMA etc. in a way that isn't threatening. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.comReceived on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:49:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:04 GMT