W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:04:57 -0400
To: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020820140457.F25814@www.markbaker.ca>


I'm all for other names for the section, but I think that adding
additional architectures is quite an additional burden on the group.
We have a specific charter directive to "integrate cleanly" with Web
architecture, which is why I think keeping this section focused on it
would be healthy.

If the group wants to take on that extra effort, that's fine with me,
and I would even be happy to help out.  But it is a substantial amount
of work.



On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:41:01PM -0400, Geoff Arnold wrote:
> is orthodoxy, let's document some tolerated heresies". How
> about entitling the section "Alternative Interaction State
> Paradigms" (ah, that lovely weasel-word!), with at least four
> subsections:
> - REST
> - OMA
> - Asynchronous/dynamic
> - Other
> And before you protest that we haven't clearly identified what might
> go into the third or fourth section, I believe that this omission 
> will be
> shortly corrected. In the mean time, I'd like to drive a stake into the
> ground for a multiplicity of ideas - not just REST and "deviations".
> Geoff

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 14:06:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:58 UTC