W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2002

Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:37:16 +0600
Message-ID: <00ae01c24460$ec53cfa0$08aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Hi Ugo,

The future work section lists "service composition" ... by which
we meant future work on global models. I agree its somewhat a poor
choice of words.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:55 AM
Subject: RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"


> 
> Hi Sanjiva,
> I quickly checked Chapter 13, Future Directions, but I don't see any
> reference to future work on a global model.
> 
> If I missed it, please let me know where it talks about it. This is
> important to understand BPEL's future direction.
> 
> Thank you,
> Ugo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: edwink@collaxa.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Edwin,
> 
> > I am a little confused: Aren't "abstract BPEL 
> > processes" suppose to represent business protocols 
> > and provide a global model?
> 
> No! They represent in some sense the projection of a global
> model to one partner. That is, effectively the public
> process or interface of the service in terms of order of
> execution etc..
> 
> I believe global models work is listed in the BPEL doc
> as future work, but I may be mistaken.
> 
> Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 09:38:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:04 GMT