W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Choreography and REST

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 11:01:58 -0400
To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF9536243E.7F9E29DF-ON85256C13.0050ADF7-85256C13.00527FF0@rchland.ibm.com>

I never claimed that they solved the same problem. It is my understanding 
WSCI could be used as a means of providing an external/public 
representation of 
an interface to an EDOC business process. You would have to discuss this 
with the WSCI authors.
I do know that Karsten Riemer of Sun, one of the authors of the WSCI spec, 
was actively engaged
in both the ebXML BP and OMG EDOC efforts and had a specific objective of
aligning the two such that they complemented one another. I believe that 
he had
a similar goal of alignment for WSCI.

My point was that you claimed that the OMG never felt the need for 
I believe that the EDOC RFP belies your claim.


Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624

Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> wrote on 08/12/2002 10:28:07 AM:

> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> > 
> >...
> > 
> > Actually, the OMG (aka CORBA people) do feel they need a "choreography
> > language". It's called EDOC[1]. It is needed for many of the same 
> > as Geoff cites in one of his responses to this thread (e.g. the trend
> > towards public v private semantics).
> I can't see how EDOC and WSCI solve the same problem in their respective
> architectures. Could you please enlighten me? 
> -- 
> "When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim 
> suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith 
> -- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk."
> Congressman James Traficant.
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 11:11:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:58 UTC