W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2004

Re: So Long and thanks for all the fish (spec maintenance, new versions)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 21:38:00 +0100
Message-ID: <40BCE928.903@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, Semantic Web Coorination Group <w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

Dan Connolly wrote:

>>  with webont coming to an official end, is there a mechanism for an
>>evolution to happen?  
> Yes; it's basically the same mechanism that got the OWL work started
> in the first place: The Director proposes new work (in an Activity
> Proposal); the Advisory Committee reviews it, and The Director
> decides based on the review feedback.
> Points 1 and 2 in this summary are pretty good
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/intro.html#Intro

I think the key point at this stage is
"People generate interest in a particular topic"
Personally, I suspect OWL 1.0 needs a fair bit of deployment experience 
before anyone can say what OWL 2.0 should be like. But I suppose in 
SWBPDWG or elsewhere we may end up adding to the postponed issues with 
OWL, and adding to our knowledge of how to address these, sufficiently 
to make OWL 2.0 worthwhile.

Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2004 16:39:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:57 UTC