I earlier reported that my code did not pass the test for cyclic structures: http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/byIssue#I5.26-006 I fixed my code today. As I was half way through fixing the code, it passed that test and did not fail any others (well that part of the code). A colleague argues that you should only write code to pass tests - so I wrote a few more tests to fail before writing the half of the cycle detection fix to my code. These are: I5.26-008 A cycle of unnamed individuals http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.26-008 I5.5-005 Well formed list comprehension http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.5-005 I5.5-006 A cylic list http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.5-006 I5.5-007 A list with itself inside an element. http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.5-007 The last three also investigate further the list comprehension rules. (My code failed those tests and so I fixed it). I imagine parsers such as Sean's and Peter's code cope with these no problem. JeremyReceived on Monday, 29 September 2003 12:03:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT